“The crisis will last until it is recognozed everywhere that (Muslim) migration is the Trojan Horse of terrorism.”Says Viktor Orban, the Prime MInister of Hungary.
Muslims are mainly refugees, immigrants and converts in Europe and elsewhere while local acceptance about them is dangerously diminishing because of superstitions, separatism and terrorism associated with aggressive Arabism.
The faith of Islam is said to be Quranic so imitating Arabs has only been an additional enforcement through culturally devastating Arab invasions of other societies during their subjugations to Arab occupations. It is a matter of fact that initially Arabs opposed Islam before intstigating their predatory wars with the pretext of expanding this religion. It is the time to set them apart.
Linguistic diversity along with cultural integrity in Europe is of a similar character as it is in India. That is why the Indian tragedy manifests a chronology making European Islamophobia additionally evident. The invading Arabized minority enslaved natives for centuries, whom they called Hindus. Hindus id est Indians were a diversified nation of multiple religions so welcomed Muslims as well but conversion-minded Arabized Muslims mainly failed in reciprocating that. Even after migrating into India they preferred staying separate and continued calling the rest of not converted people as Hindus excepting themselves as Muslims. Thus considering the rest of people altogether as a counter-religion.
Later on Arabized Muslims as minority in India got the country divided for forming Pakistan by eliminating the native not converted Hindu minority in reoccupied areas in the name of a direct action as per their two nations theory. Although Muslims were no nation but a religion. Even Arabs are not any one nation but mere a foreign language. So soon thereafter the Bangla Mukti Sangram was fought to safeguard the local naturalness in East Pakistan. Now the Kashmir problem is a naked example of genocidal Arabized crimes against the native not converted minority of Kashmiri Pandits in the valley. The very existence of the Organisation of Islamic Countries establishes very well that nations are made out of local naturalness instead of Islam or Arabism.
Recently India refused to take in any Rohingya Muslim refugees. Thereafter Citizenship Amendment Act was brought in for giving citizenship to the people except Muslims whoever had come in to India prior to 31 December 2014 upon being oppressed for religious reasons in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Similarly “Turning Muslims Away, Poland Welcomes Ukrainians” has been a headline in The Wall Street Journal on March 26, 2019. It is not any Islamophobia but a realpolitik of preventing aggressive Arabism.
Muslims ought to abide by local naturalness in their own countries instead of imitating Arabs as any occupying force by unnecessarily naming themselves in Arabic if they are not Arabs. Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world. Its fifth President Megavati Sukarnoputri is a Muslim but without naming herself or her people in Arabic. Confusing with an Arab identity has nothing to do with being a Muslim somewhere else. Only a true adherance to local naturalness is going to help Muslim migrants and refugess anywhere in reestablishing themselves with dignity.
Immigrants move in anywhere seeking better opportunities for themselves so they must abide with local naturalness everywhere. Arabs are no more an occupying force anywhere and there is no Arab nation to take Muslims back as theirs. Contrarily most of the refugees have come out of Arab countries as a few places there became inhabitable.
A decade ago historically neutral Switzerland became the first European country that banned building minarets on mosques along with wearing burqa by Muslim women and now witnessing a public campaign to consider banning Muslims from praying in public places.
Islam is not aggressive Arabism. The faith need not ever be abiding with Arab aggressions as that makes Muslims’ assimilation in any society almost impossible.